![]() ![]() ![]() Dan Lewis, chief, Urban Risk Reduction Unit and head, City Resilience Profiling Programme, UN Habitat.Elizabeth Johnston, executive director, European Forum for Urban Security and executive director, French Forum for Urban Security.David Buck, senior fellow, public health and inequalities, The King’s Fund.Alan Brill, managing director, Kroll Cyber Security.Nathalie Alvarado, citizen security lead specialist, Inter-American Development Bank.Our thanks are due to the following people (listed alphabetically by surname) for their time and insights: Exceptions include Tokyo and Berlin, which climbed four and two spots, respectively, while Chicago slipped five spots, from seventh to 12th.Findings from the index were supplemented with wide-ranging research and in-depth interviews with experts in the field. Stability is the word for the ranking's global leaders: the top three cities stayed put compared with last year, while Boston and San Francisco simply switched places. 6 th), two other European cities (Berlin 9 th and Amsterdam 10 th), and two Asian (Seoul 7 th and Tokyo 8 th.) Rounding out the top 10 are three other American cities (Boston 4 th, San Francisco 5 th, and Washington, D.C. It is a clear reminder that a perfect city does not yet exist, and that all still have room for improvement. However, all three cities have poor social cohesion scores, ranking 153rd, 105th and 86th, respectively. ![]() London tops the Mobility and Transportation and the Human Capital dimensions, being the city with the highest number of business schools and universities, while also standing out in International Impact (2 nd.) First in International Impact, Paris proves the world’s most popular tourist destination. New York is the world’s most important economic center, ranking first for this dimension, and is in second place for Technology. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |